Bug 75 - Define good monitoring presets
Status:
RESOLVED FIXED
Component:
GUI :: gtkmm
Version:
unspecified
Hardware:
PC Linux
Importance:
P3 normal
Target Milestone:
---
Assignee:
Rob Caelers
URL:
Depends on:
Blocks:
Reported:
Sep 14 2002 20:27:21 UTC
by:
Raymond Penners
Modified:
Oct 22 2002 01:54:46 UTC
| Who | When | What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Penners | Sep 14 2002 20:27:29 UTC | blocks | 45 | 45, |
| Raymond Penners | Sep 14 2002 20:34:29 UTC | blocks | 74 | |
| Raymond Penners | Oct 17 2002 11:56:43 UTC | summary | Define good monitoring presets | Define good monitoring presets |
| Raymond Penners | Oct 17 2002 13:09:37 UTC | status | NEW | RESOLVED |
| resolution | FIXED |
Description
Raymond Penners Sep 14 2002 20:27:21 UTC
We need some good values for activity/idle/noise for each of these settings.
// name, activity, idle, noise
{ "Trigger-happy", 1000, 1000, 0 },
{ "Nervous", 1000, 1000, 500 },
{ "Alert", 2000, 5000, 1000 },
{ "Normal", 1000, 5000, 9000 }, // Preferable KJ's settings
{ "Sluggish", 1000, 10000, 9000 }, // Rob's settings
{ "Numb", 1000, 10000, 9000 },Comment 1
Raymond Penners Oct 17 2002 11:56:43 UTC
I've checked the current settings, and all look fine to me, except for "Quick" and "Normal". Two problems here: a) Normal uses settings where noise time > activity time. b) Quick is slower than normal. a) needs to be fixed first, and then we can come up with a decent "Quick" that fits in between "Trigger happy" and "Normal". But, I am going nuts here... I've been trying to find some settings where noise time < activity time that behave +/- similarly to the current "Normal". HELP!
Comment 2
Raymond Penners Oct 17 2002 13:09:37 UTC
Do not DARE reopen this bug.